Quantcast
Channel: Fenil and Bollywood
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 39781

No film can have Chandni Bar in the title without our consent-Madhur Bhandarkar

$
0
0

Renuka Vyavahare (BOMBAY TIMES; March 19, 2016)

Madhur Bhandarkar and Amit Mohan, who directed and pro duced Chandni Bar, are appalled by reports of Chandni Bar 2 Ruby Bar being made as a sequel of their Tabu-starrer. Says Madhur, “Chandni Bar is close to me and we have the title rights. We are fine as along as they change their title. But associating it with our film is out of question.“

Amit adds, “The intent is obvious - they want to cash in on our original film. We have the IPR (Intellectual Property Rights) of our film. No one can use or reproduce parts of the film or title without our consent. We have approached our lawyers and will fight this out.“
------------------------
The producer’s son of a Tabu-starrer files a complaint at IMPPA against the makers of the sequel; latter claim that the film isn’t a sequel at all
Anirban Das (MID-DAY; March 19, 2016)

It was reported that Mumtaz Ahmed is producing a sequel to Madhur Bhandarkar’s Chandni Bar (2001) to be directed by Harish Kotian. However, Amit Mohan, son of the original film’s producer, late Lata Mohan, claims to hold the copyrights of the film currently, and he has filed a complaint at the Indian Motion Picture Producers’ Association (IMPPA). In his letter, Mohan has mentioned that he was surprised to know that Chandni Bar’s sequel is being made without his permission.

“I have filed a complaint at IMPPA on March 17. They (members of IMPPA) had a meeting and they will be taking some action against the defaulting producer. It’s a copyright and trademark violation. They have admitted that they are making a sequel to the film,” says Mohan adding that he is willing to drag the producers to court, if need be. “I am considering two lawyers, one in Mumbai and one in Delhi, ” he says.

Mohan says that he along with the original film’s director Madhur Bhandarkar is planning to produce the sequel. He says, “We are planning a sequel ourselves. A film with a similar title will not only be harmful, but also entail losses to us. The title given to the producer should be revoked and he should be put on a default list so that he cannot make the film.”

Different tale
When contacted, the producer and director of the second part who had earlier reported to have confirmed that they are making a sequel to Chandni Bar are now refuting any such claims. “This is not a sequel. The complete title is Chandni Bar 2 Ruby Bar and if people are considering it a sequel then it’s their mistake. This is a different story,” says Mumtaz Ahmed.

Harish, who had earlier said to have gone on record to say that his film is a sequel also claims otherwise. Both of them also mentioned that they are unaware of the complaint filed against them at IMPPA.

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 39781

Trending Articles